(Warning: mild Alias spoilers for season 1)
You know how you know you watch too much TV?
Kat and I had just finished Psych and were attempting to figure out our new show to watch. We were going to do Sports Night but finally settled on Alias as usually we watch shows I have watched, but Alias is one that Kat has seen and I have not.
We got to the episode where Sydney decides to turn her father in and as soon as he walks into the meeting and says something about how Sydney can now learn the truth I go "Oh, it was the mother who was the spy."
Kat informs me that most people would not jump to that conclusion at once, but it makes good, economical sense to have the mother be the spy, and have Vaughn's dad be killed by this unknown agent who could be Sydney's dad -- too many characters can drag a show down.
So yes. I watch too much television because I knew without any real foreshadowing about this secret on Alias. I am a giant dork.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
A Second List of Possibilities
Shows that have been added to my repertoire:
36. Psych
37. Alias
38. Futurama
39. Avatar: The Last Airbender
40. The IT Crowd
41. Sherlock
42. Black Adder
43. Sports Night
44. Episodes
45. Mr. Sunshine
46. Dead Like Me
47. Fullmetal Alchemist
47. Fullmetal Alchemist
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Influences
For a blog about analyzing writing, lately, its become slightly personal. I don't know where the last entry came from, except I didn't have anywhere else to put it. I need to update this more -- figure out where its actually going and coming from. But anyways, I'll do that later.
There was a facebook meme going around where you put down 15 authors who have influenced you. I think it was more about thoughts and ideas then about writing, but I think its applicable. I didn't post it on facebook, but I'll post it here along with commentary. They are listed in no particular order, just who I thought of first.
1. Douglas Adams
Comedy has never been a strong suit of mine. If I do anything comedic, it is always sarcastic and dry; very British as my friends would say, though to be honest, I don't know if its true that British humor is so clear cut. I will, however, admit to the fact that Douglas Adams always makes me want to write comedic stuff. I once attempted it by emulating his voice -- putting the preposterous into a statement that appears to make sense -- and it was awful, just awful.
That being said, Douglas has influenced the way I view writing about space. My NaNo, which changed dramatically this year, was in space, and I often found myself borrowing from some of the more ridiculous things that Douglas does -- the names, and on occasion, the creatures. There was a lot of creative energy, imagination and plan interest in all of Douglas's work, and that is something I aspire to.
2. Neil Gaiman
Its funny, I was reading The Sandman at the desk the other day and someone asked me what else Neil had written that I had read. I got kind of stuck because despite the fact that I feel like there is a lot of Neil Gaiman out there, I haven't read all of it. I've done Stardust and American Gods. I've read The Graveyard Book and some of his short stories, but when it comes down to it, I am always at a loss as to what to say when someone asks that question.
Neil's influence on me has not been writing style -- I will admit I found some of American Gods hard to read because of the writing style -- but rather on ideas. In Stardust, Fairy is constantly changing, growing as people dream it, and it came from seeing a wall while driving. In American Gods, a war is coming, but it is between the old gods, and technology itself, a fascinating mixing of layers and intrigues.
I don't want to write like Neil, I want to think like Neil -- finding a story where ever you look.
3. Clive Barker
Abarat is the only book I have read by Clive (plus its sequel) and if you've never read it, I hope you do. When you do, I suggest you get the color version with his artwork. Its beautiful.
That being said, Clive has actually influenced me in other ways then me thinking about writing a story with images (though after reading Abarat I thought about trying it. Its an in progress project that will take forever to finish because its all on my mother's computer and I would need a wacom tablet to really do it). Similar to Neil, Clive has amazing ideas. The idea of twenty four islands that exist as times of day is interesting and provides a fantastical and fantastic backdrop for the story, which is surprising and rich.
Abarat was the most original story I had read at the time and when I was done I sat still, wondering how I would ever write something so different from what you expect.
4. Diane Duane
Young Wizards and the world that it inhabits is probably my favorite series apart from Harry Potter. In some ways, Diane's world outclasses J. K.'s, but really I would like to keep them as separate as possible, despite them both being about wizards working behind the scenes of our own world. Now that's out of the way...
I don't remember reading the first book in this series clearly. So You Want to be a Wizard was good, but a little distant to me at the time, but the idea of magic being controlled by words -- the Speech -- a basic language for the universe was so interesting to me. Young Wizards remains completely technologically based with the Speech being a programming language. The concept of the world as such is extremely pleasing to my world view -- everything based on logic in terms of magic, making the twists that the characters manage to pull out all the better because you don't see it coming but it makes so much sense.
But its not just the internal rules making so much sense (despite the shifting time period, though I appreciate that as who would want to read a book that was still in the eighties when there are so many opportunities in modern life to play with for Diane), its also about the character's themselves. Nita especially.
I am so glad I read these books as a teenager (and again as a young adult, they are still coming out). There is something so relatable about the characters and you love them and sometimes you hate them, but you always understand where they are coming from. Wizard's Dilemma never fails to make me cry -- hard and most of the way through the book -- Wizards at War never fails to make my heart skip a beat in the middle, and at the end my heart breaks over and over again. A Wizard of Mars had me cheering at the end, despite my disinclination towards Nita and Kit being together. These are characters that I love and I want to keep reading about them. And that is the main influence I have gotten from Diane.
The last thing I got from her is the fact that you can have serial novels -- there is no limit to the number of Young Wizard novels she can write because the premise is solid. Saving the world is Nita and Kit's job -- but its also Dairine's and Carmela's -- and all the characters you never get to meet. They aren't the only ones saving the world, we just get to watch their part, and that is really interesting to me.
5. William Styron
Whenever I get asked what my favorite book is, I feel an onrush of panic. What to say? I love Harry Potter a lot, but what about Young Wizards? And what if its just one book that I have to decide on -- my favorite book from a series? I don't generally, read books that are stand alone making it difficult to decide. So I say "What? That's like Sophie's Choice! Deciding on ONE book as my favorite? Luckily, I really like Sophie's Choice so let's say that."
Of all the authors I have read, William Styron (who I can't call by his first name), has influenced my writing style. I read Sophie's Choice in high school in the best English class I've ever been in (AP English with DePeter) and we looked at the language carefully and it was then that I decided -- I want to write like this.
Styron introduced me to the dash, to beautiful language, to self referential writing, to discussion of mental illness without really talking about it. There is so much about this book that I want to emulate. If I were to ever write a novel that wasn't fantasy/sci fi, I would want to write a novel like Sophie's Choice.
6. Louisa May Alcott
There's a FRIENDS episode where Rachel says she has re-read Little Women a lot, a classic, and I know exactly what she means. I have re-read Little Women so many times since I first opened it in third grade. Each time I come away with something new -- a different association, and point of interest. Little Women still makes me cry when Beth dies, still makes me incredibly happy when Laurie comes for Amy in Vevey, and remains one of my favorite books of all time.
Sometimes I think about how the book is set up -- a group of stories about a family that loves one another. There is a moral -- all books at that time had to have one -- but if you ignore the moral, then you get a lovely portrait of people -- and that is the important message about writing. Character's always drive my interest in reading, and in writing.
7. L. M. Montgomery
Similar to Ms. Alcott, Mrs. Montgomery has a childhood appeal to her. I read Anne of Green Gables, Anne of Avonlea, and Anne of the Island before stopping. I like thinking of these three books as a trio and ignoring the rest because I never got into the rest. However the appeal is partly Anne -- again a character based story surprisingly -- but also the kind of childhood scrapes people get into, the childlike delight Anne takes in everything which allows a nostalgic feeling and that is something I enjoy and use today in my own writing.
8. J. K. Rowling
While I don't remember reading So You Want to be a Wizard for the first time, I remember Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone clearly. I was in England in fifth grade for a month, and I was in my aunt's house, which was a converted barn at the time. My cousin Josh gave me the book, and said he liked it, and I had already received Chamber of Secrets from my grandmother for Christmas, so I thought Why not?
I didn't stop reading until I got to the end. This is the first book I read cover to cover. And I still remember how freaked out I was by the end, how I kept making funny noises and shaking with how awesome this book was/is.
There is no way that J. K. couldn't have influenced me. The subtle influence, of word choice and character creation is something that comes from other places, but for me the reason J. K. continues to be a major influence in my writing is the world building she did.
9. C. S. Lewis
After the last post you might be confused as to why I would put down a clearly Christian writer, but L. M. Montgomery and Louisa May Alcott were more preachy about religion then these books in my opinion. Well except The Magician's Nephew, but lets move on.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe was certainly among the first books that I remember reading. I re-read them every now and then (and with the new movie, which I still have not seen, so no spoilers please) I probably will read them again. There is something incredibly nostalgic and endearing about them that I love. This from a series that was published around the time of Lord of the Rings and with just as rich a background story, but with language that was easy to understand, and a story that takes a lot of the ancient and makes it modern.
10. Phillip Pullman
As soon as I put down C. S. Lewis, I knew I had to put down Phillip. I ran through The Golden Compass, was obsessed with The Subtle Knife and got The Amber Spyglass the day it came out (I was sick, but my dad picked it up for me... also was in sixth grade so I wasn't able to go at midnight to wait for it). Again, as with J. K. I was subtly influenced by Phillip. His writing is interesting and nuanced. It laces science with religion and creates a world that is almost, but not quite, like our own in such a way that you believe it -- deeply and seriously.
I read other things by Phillip -- though I can't remember them clearly as Sally Darling did not stay in my head the way Lyra did -- but what I do remember is the complexity of character, the way it was definitely the characters that drew me in. And, would you look at that, I love characters.
11. Tamora Pierce
Without a doubt Tamora Pierce has influenced the way I write the most seriously. My first attempt at a chaptered work was a cheap Tammy knock off. There is a lot to be said about what Tammy did for my sense of fantasy writing. Large scale battles, and women with swords and magical fire that burst from their fingertips had never occurred to me until I read her work.
Tammy's worlds are typically fantastical, but they are rooted in reality. There are gods and goddesses that regularly visit and talk with characters. Magic is common, and possessed by those born to it. The thing about Tammy's work is not that she breaks boundaries in her worlds, but in that she empowers her female characters while maintaining their femininity. They are people and it wasn't until I got into broader fantasy that I realized this was not common.
12. Garth Nix
If you have never read Sabriel I suggest you do. The world Garth created in this work is endlessly fascinating with a deep and rich background history. And he does it over and over again. I have only read the Old Kingdom series and The Keys to the Kingdom, but both of them have wonderful worlds and a definite sense of time and space.
The attention to real detail is something that I have picked up from Garth. He is specific in many of his descriptions, lending them the aspects of the objects or things in question. Scenes are better done when there is an exact quality to the descriptions, ideas of time and space and clearer when you are given measurements (though not too many). I have never read anything else quite like it, but I find the level of detail in Garth's work something to live up to.
13. David Sedaris
Moving out of my childhood books, we get to David. Ah David, you funny, funny man. I have already said that humor has never been my strong suit, but I do find that reading and listening to it to be the best way to learn how it is done. Whether it is through the comedy of performance (which David does) or the way he states things with clarity, he is able to provoke a laugh.
Sometimes a turn of phrase, or a way of saying something that is so thoroughly different and bizarre, but perfectly right, will come out of me and I know it has come from reading him.
14. Malcolm Gladwell
Moving out of fiction all together we get to Malcolm and Mary. Malcolm Gladwell has influenced the way I think in many respects, not because I agree with him all the time, but because every time he says something I think about whether or not I do agree with him based on his arguments.
Writing fiction might not be trying to make you agree that communication is the best, but it certainly is about trying to get people to believe in what you are writing. Malcolm has shown some obvious flaws in logic in some of his writing, but the interesting thing is not that he does so, but that it can show you flaws in your own logic. There have been times when I have found myself backpedalling, attempting to find the edge of my "argument" because I can sense such a hole appearing. I'd like to give some of that credit to Malcolm.
15. Mary Roach
Dealing with horrible situations with dry witticisms, Mary Roach has convinced me that it is always important to have a sense of humor. Death seems to attract Mary a little, but I don't mind, it does me too -- and for Mary its always a little different. However, the tendency, that I believe is mostly human, to add humor to situations that are grime is very telling.
All death, mayhem and horror is not something you read. Gallows humor on the other hand -- you can read and laugh.
So there it is. My 15 influences. Who's influenced you, people who are starting to comment on here to my shock. :)
There was a facebook meme going around where you put down 15 authors who have influenced you. I think it was more about thoughts and ideas then about writing, but I think its applicable. I didn't post it on facebook, but I'll post it here along with commentary. They are listed in no particular order, just who I thought of first.
1. Douglas Adams
Comedy has never been a strong suit of mine. If I do anything comedic, it is always sarcastic and dry; very British as my friends would say, though to be honest, I don't know if its true that British humor is so clear cut. I will, however, admit to the fact that Douglas Adams always makes me want to write comedic stuff. I once attempted it by emulating his voice -- putting the preposterous into a statement that appears to make sense -- and it was awful, just awful.
That being said, Douglas has influenced the way I view writing about space. My NaNo, which changed dramatically this year, was in space, and I often found myself borrowing from some of the more ridiculous things that Douglas does -- the names, and on occasion, the creatures. There was a lot of creative energy, imagination and plan interest in all of Douglas's work, and that is something I aspire to.
2. Neil Gaiman
Its funny, I was reading The Sandman at the desk the other day and someone asked me what else Neil had written that I had read. I got kind of stuck because despite the fact that I feel like there is a lot of Neil Gaiman out there, I haven't read all of it. I've done Stardust and American Gods. I've read The Graveyard Book and some of his short stories, but when it comes down to it, I am always at a loss as to what to say when someone asks that question.
Neil's influence on me has not been writing style -- I will admit I found some of American Gods hard to read because of the writing style -- but rather on ideas. In Stardust, Fairy is constantly changing, growing as people dream it, and it came from seeing a wall while driving. In American Gods, a war is coming, but it is between the old gods, and technology itself, a fascinating mixing of layers and intrigues.
I don't want to write like Neil, I want to think like Neil -- finding a story where ever you look.
3. Clive Barker
Abarat is the only book I have read by Clive (plus its sequel) and if you've never read it, I hope you do. When you do, I suggest you get the color version with his artwork. Its beautiful.
That being said, Clive has actually influenced me in other ways then me thinking about writing a story with images (though after reading Abarat I thought about trying it. Its an in progress project that will take forever to finish because its all on my mother's computer and I would need a wacom tablet to really do it). Similar to Neil, Clive has amazing ideas. The idea of twenty four islands that exist as times of day is interesting and provides a fantastical and fantastic backdrop for the story, which is surprising and rich.
Abarat was the most original story I had read at the time and when I was done I sat still, wondering how I would ever write something so different from what you expect.
4. Diane Duane
Young Wizards and the world that it inhabits is probably my favorite series apart from Harry Potter. In some ways, Diane's world outclasses J. K.'s, but really I would like to keep them as separate as possible, despite them both being about wizards working behind the scenes of our own world. Now that's out of the way...
I don't remember reading the first book in this series clearly. So You Want to be a Wizard was good, but a little distant to me at the time, but the idea of magic being controlled by words -- the Speech -- a basic language for the universe was so interesting to me. Young Wizards remains completely technologically based with the Speech being a programming language. The concept of the world as such is extremely pleasing to my world view -- everything based on logic in terms of magic, making the twists that the characters manage to pull out all the better because you don't see it coming but it makes so much sense.
But its not just the internal rules making so much sense (despite the shifting time period, though I appreciate that as who would want to read a book that was still in the eighties when there are so many opportunities in modern life to play with for Diane), its also about the character's themselves. Nita especially.
I am so glad I read these books as a teenager (and again as a young adult, they are still coming out). There is something so relatable about the characters and you love them and sometimes you hate them, but you always understand where they are coming from. Wizard's Dilemma never fails to make me cry -- hard and most of the way through the book -- Wizards at War never fails to make my heart skip a beat in the middle, and at the end my heart breaks over and over again. A Wizard of Mars had me cheering at the end, despite my disinclination towards Nita and Kit being together. These are characters that I love and I want to keep reading about them. And that is the main influence I have gotten from Diane.
The last thing I got from her is the fact that you can have serial novels -- there is no limit to the number of Young Wizard novels she can write because the premise is solid. Saving the world is Nita and Kit's job -- but its also Dairine's and Carmela's -- and all the characters you never get to meet. They aren't the only ones saving the world, we just get to watch their part, and that is really interesting to me.
5. William Styron
Whenever I get asked what my favorite book is, I feel an onrush of panic. What to say? I love Harry Potter a lot, but what about Young Wizards? And what if its just one book that I have to decide on -- my favorite book from a series? I don't generally, read books that are stand alone making it difficult to decide. So I say "What? That's like Sophie's Choice! Deciding on ONE book as my favorite? Luckily, I really like Sophie's Choice so let's say that."
Of all the authors I have read, William Styron (who I can't call by his first name), has influenced my writing style. I read Sophie's Choice in high school in the best English class I've ever been in (AP English with DePeter) and we looked at the language carefully and it was then that I decided -- I want to write like this.
Styron introduced me to the dash, to beautiful language, to self referential writing, to discussion of mental illness without really talking about it. There is so much about this book that I want to emulate. If I were to ever write a novel that wasn't fantasy/sci fi, I would want to write a novel like Sophie's Choice.
6. Louisa May Alcott
There's a FRIENDS episode where Rachel says she has re-read Little Women a lot, a classic, and I know exactly what she means. I have re-read Little Women so many times since I first opened it in third grade. Each time I come away with something new -- a different association, and point of interest. Little Women still makes me cry when Beth dies, still makes me incredibly happy when Laurie comes for Amy in Vevey, and remains one of my favorite books of all time.
Sometimes I think about how the book is set up -- a group of stories about a family that loves one another. There is a moral -- all books at that time had to have one -- but if you ignore the moral, then you get a lovely portrait of people -- and that is the important message about writing. Character's always drive my interest in reading, and in writing.
7. L. M. Montgomery
Similar to Ms. Alcott, Mrs. Montgomery has a childhood appeal to her. I read Anne of Green Gables, Anne of Avonlea, and Anne of the Island before stopping. I like thinking of these three books as a trio and ignoring the rest because I never got into the rest. However the appeal is partly Anne -- again a character based story surprisingly -- but also the kind of childhood scrapes people get into, the childlike delight Anne takes in everything which allows a nostalgic feeling and that is something I enjoy and use today in my own writing.
8. J. K. Rowling
While I don't remember reading So You Want to be a Wizard for the first time, I remember Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone clearly. I was in England in fifth grade for a month, and I was in my aunt's house, which was a converted barn at the time. My cousin Josh gave me the book, and said he liked it, and I had already received Chamber of Secrets from my grandmother for Christmas, so I thought Why not?
I didn't stop reading until I got to the end. This is the first book I read cover to cover. And I still remember how freaked out I was by the end, how I kept making funny noises and shaking with how awesome this book was/is.
There is no way that J. K. couldn't have influenced me. The subtle influence, of word choice and character creation is something that comes from other places, but for me the reason J. K. continues to be a major influence in my writing is the world building she did.
9. C. S. Lewis
After the last post you might be confused as to why I would put down a clearly Christian writer, but L. M. Montgomery and Louisa May Alcott were more preachy about religion then these books in my opinion. Well except The Magician's Nephew, but lets move on.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe was certainly among the first books that I remember reading. I re-read them every now and then (and with the new movie, which I still have not seen, so no spoilers please) I probably will read them again. There is something incredibly nostalgic and endearing about them that I love. This from a series that was published around the time of Lord of the Rings and with just as rich a background story, but with language that was easy to understand, and a story that takes a lot of the ancient and makes it modern.
10. Phillip Pullman
As soon as I put down C. S. Lewis, I knew I had to put down Phillip. I ran through The Golden Compass, was obsessed with The Subtle Knife and got The Amber Spyglass the day it came out (I was sick, but my dad picked it up for me... also was in sixth grade so I wasn't able to go at midnight to wait for it). Again, as with J. K. I was subtly influenced by Phillip. His writing is interesting and nuanced. It laces science with religion and creates a world that is almost, but not quite, like our own in such a way that you believe it -- deeply and seriously.
I read other things by Phillip -- though I can't remember them clearly as Sally Darling did not stay in my head the way Lyra did -- but what I do remember is the complexity of character, the way it was definitely the characters that drew me in. And, would you look at that, I love characters.
11. Tamora Pierce
Without a doubt Tamora Pierce has influenced the way I write the most seriously. My first attempt at a chaptered work was a cheap Tammy knock off. There is a lot to be said about what Tammy did for my sense of fantasy writing. Large scale battles, and women with swords and magical fire that burst from their fingertips had never occurred to me until I read her work.
Tammy's worlds are typically fantastical, but they are rooted in reality. There are gods and goddesses that regularly visit and talk with characters. Magic is common, and possessed by those born to it. The thing about Tammy's work is not that she breaks boundaries in her worlds, but in that she empowers her female characters while maintaining their femininity. They are people and it wasn't until I got into broader fantasy that I realized this was not common.
12. Garth Nix
If you have never read Sabriel I suggest you do. The world Garth created in this work is endlessly fascinating with a deep and rich background history. And he does it over and over again. I have only read the Old Kingdom series and The Keys to the Kingdom, but both of them have wonderful worlds and a definite sense of time and space.
The attention to real detail is something that I have picked up from Garth. He is specific in many of his descriptions, lending them the aspects of the objects or things in question. Scenes are better done when there is an exact quality to the descriptions, ideas of time and space and clearer when you are given measurements (though not too many). I have never read anything else quite like it, but I find the level of detail in Garth's work something to live up to.
13. David Sedaris
Moving out of my childhood books, we get to David. Ah David, you funny, funny man. I have already said that humor has never been my strong suit, but I do find that reading and listening to it to be the best way to learn how it is done. Whether it is through the comedy of performance (which David does) or the way he states things with clarity, he is able to provoke a laugh.
Sometimes a turn of phrase, or a way of saying something that is so thoroughly different and bizarre, but perfectly right, will come out of me and I know it has come from reading him.
14. Malcolm Gladwell
Moving out of fiction all together we get to Malcolm and Mary. Malcolm Gladwell has influenced the way I think in many respects, not because I agree with him all the time, but because every time he says something I think about whether or not I do agree with him based on his arguments.
Writing fiction might not be trying to make you agree that communication is the best, but it certainly is about trying to get people to believe in what you are writing. Malcolm has shown some obvious flaws in logic in some of his writing, but the interesting thing is not that he does so, but that it can show you flaws in your own logic. There have been times when I have found myself backpedalling, attempting to find the edge of my "argument" because I can sense such a hole appearing. I'd like to give some of that credit to Malcolm.
15. Mary Roach
Dealing with horrible situations with dry witticisms, Mary Roach has convinced me that it is always important to have a sense of humor. Death seems to attract Mary a little, but I don't mind, it does me too -- and for Mary its always a little different. However, the tendency, that I believe is mostly human, to add humor to situations that are grime is very telling.
All death, mayhem and horror is not something you read. Gallows humor on the other hand -- you can read and laugh.
So there it is. My 15 influences. Who's influenced you, people who are starting to comment on here to my shock. :)
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Religious Preference?
I was at the hospital today and was asked if I had a religious preference in the admissions interview. I have never been asked if I had a religious preference -- except by facebook and places where I could make it public if I chose -- so I was thrown into a loop of unexpected questioning.
I am an atheist, and it is an incredibly important part of my self identity. Its been increasingly important throughout college as I was exposed to people with strong religious beliefs and found myself challenged to think about other forms and ways of life. There was L, who was adamantly Christian and thought that evolution was fine, but God had set it up to run, and K who was Catholic and intense about her conservative norms (despite being a lesbian, her one aberration). There is B who feels that God has to exist as a power in the universe, and M who was brought up Christian but has atheistic leanings. There is C who is a Methodist, and B who is born-again, and lets not even start in on C who will pray to God to clean his food when it falls on the ground. Anyways, there is so much religion out there that seems to predominate everything about the world, and I didn't realize it until I got to college.
Before college I hadn't really thought too much about it. Atheism seemed to come naturally to me as a result of thinking hard about what the universe was like. I spent my younger years thinking that God was some sort of big guy in the sky, and being confused about the father son and holy ghost bit, but really caring about Santa and the Tooth Fairy more. When I was in Catholic School for two years, I thought for a while I was Christian, but the more I went to mass, the more I felt like it was all empty gestures, done to impress someone who didn't exist. I wasn't sure what it meant when I said I didn't believe in god, and until high school, I didn't really admit to being an atheist, still trying to figure out what the word meant.
I did eventually proclaim to the world I was an atheist. Science bases my world, and according to science, there really isn't a need for a big guy in the sky, a force in the universe, God, to do anything. Molecules will form, evolution will occur, without magic, or a watchmaker or whatever. The world spins, the universe expands and science explains it all. Even if there were a big guy out there orchestrating everything, he wouldn't be needed, so why have him at all?
I was brought up in a world where science is expanding its knowledge at every turn, and explaining the things we used to not be able to explain, but also in a world where religion still holds on to the minds of everyone around me and it makes me sad. What also makes me sad, is the fact that because I don't conform to a religious ideology, people will make assumptions -- mean and jagged assumptions.
Only once have I been attacked for my stance on God personally, but I often feel attacked. Every sign that proclaims that God has something to do with so-called morality, every time someone (even myself, for I will confess to using 'God' in a habitual manner) uses God as a noun, as a person who can hear what is being said, or explicative, tells me that I am strange, that I should believe because non-belief is tantamount to admitting I am an alien from another planet.
To me there is an important distinction between non-religious, and atheism. Julia Sweeney says in 'Letting Go of God' that she just considers herself to be a naturalist, and religious people are therefore a-naturalist, and while I sincerely believe what she says for her reasons why, the common person won't without the background that explains what a naturalist is.
This morning I was moved into a waiting area and when the nurse came to register me, she looked at me and said "Ms. Waters, do you have a religious preference?" and I froze. I thought about whether or not atheism counted as a religion, or if there was a label for it in her system. I sometimes have this paralysis over the question "race". If there is an option for "other" I write in human. Race is not a true distinction, merely a formal construct, like god, that humans created. But atheism is not a religion, its a lack of religion.
So I sat there feeling like I was betraying myself, worrying over I was counted now as "non-religious" or atheist.
I said atheist in the end. It is, and remains, who I am.
I am an atheist, and it is an incredibly important part of my self identity. Its been increasingly important throughout college as I was exposed to people with strong religious beliefs and found myself challenged to think about other forms and ways of life. There was L, who was adamantly Christian and thought that evolution was fine, but God had set it up to run, and K who was Catholic and intense about her conservative norms (despite being a lesbian, her one aberration). There is B who feels that God has to exist as a power in the universe, and M who was brought up Christian but has atheistic leanings. There is C who is a Methodist, and B who is born-again, and lets not even start in on C who will pray to God to clean his food when it falls on the ground. Anyways, there is so much religion out there that seems to predominate everything about the world, and I didn't realize it until I got to college.
Before college I hadn't really thought too much about it. Atheism seemed to come naturally to me as a result of thinking hard about what the universe was like. I spent my younger years thinking that God was some sort of big guy in the sky, and being confused about the father son and holy ghost bit, but really caring about Santa and the Tooth Fairy more. When I was in Catholic School for two years, I thought for a while I was Christian, but the more I went to mass, the more I felt like it was all empty gestures, done to impress someone who didn't exist. I wasn't sure what it meant when I said I didn't believe in god, and until high school, I didn't really admit to being an atheist, still trying to figure out what the word meant.
I did eventually proclaim to the world I was an atheist. Science bases my world, and according to science, there really isn't a need for a big guy in the sky, a force in the universe, God, to do anything. Molecules will form, evolution will occur, without magic, or a watchmaker or whatever. The world spins, the universe expands and science explains it all. Even if there were a big guy out there orchestrating everything, he wouldn't be needed, so why have him at all?
I was brought up in a world where science is expanding its knowledge at every turn, and explaining the things we used to not be able to explain, but also in a world where religion still holds on to the minds of everyone around me and it makes me sad. What also makes me sad, is the fact that because I don't conform to a religious ideology, people will make assumptions -- mean and jagged assumptions.
Only once have I been attacked for my stance on God personally, but I often feel attacked. Every sign that proclaims that God has something to do with so-called morality, every time someone (even myself, for I will confess to using 'God' in a habitual manner) uses God as a noun, as a person who can hear what is being said, or explicative, tells me that I am strange, that I should believe because non-belief is tantamount to admitting I am an alien from another planet.
To me there is an important distinction between non-religious, and atheism. Julia Sweeney says in 'Letting Go of God' that she just considers herself to be a naturalist, and religious people are therefore a-naturalist, and while I sincerely believe what she says for her reasons why, the common person won't without the background that explains what a naturalist is.
This morning I was moved into a waiting area and when the nurse came to register me, she looked at me and said "Ms. Waters, do you have a religious preference?" and I froze. I thought about whether or not atheism counted as a religion, or if there was a label for it in her system. I sometimes have this paralysis over the question "race". If there is an option for "other" I write in human. Race is not a true distinction, merely a formal construct, like god, that humans created. But atheism is not a religion, its a lack of religion.
So I sat there feeling like I was betraying myself, worrying over I was counted now as "non-religious" or atheist.
I said atheist in the end. It is, and remains, who I am.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
NaNoWriMo Day 11
Week two stop kicking my ass.
I have done NaNo for six years and this is the first year I've had a week two. Well, its not the fault of the story, more the fault of my professors having huge projects due in classes and tests this week, and being an RA so I have to do things like put up posters and have floor events, plus Harry Potter next week, so its gotten a little crazy writing time wise.
I also might have made a decision that the people at NaNo would call stupid. I changed my entire story.
Okay, so yes, not the best plan when 1667 words a day looks difficult to work in (even for ME, when it takes half an hour to get out 1000 words at most these days), and now I have to play catch up. But, on the plus side, I'm actually liking this story.
We got a pep talk the day after I decided to quit the current story and it said that you shouldn't quit because the writing gets hard or boring, and just plow through. For beginning NaNoers, I agree. Don't quit because it gets hard. Struggling through three hundred words about the sunset or some such is not an excuse to restart your novel. But when you're 13,000 words in, and you have yet to find someone or something that sustains your interest for 1000 words, and every day getting up an writing 2000 words is a drastic struggle and relief, it sucks the fun out of the month.
Yes, writing is not supposed to be about the good days, its about the days when you just don't want to write but do it anyways. I believe this. But there is a difference from slogging through a hard novel that you are still unsure of because it sounds so cliche, with characters that don't interest you incredibly, and writing something that makes you like writing it.
I'm basically trying to justify why I restarted and abandoned Alane and friends. Perhaps that novel is not supposed to be written. Perhaps, Tia and Penny want to be written more. Whatever the reason, I can write 50,000 words easily in a month. Shouldn't I at least enjoy it?
Especially when its a month as busy as this one for me. I'm a senior in college. I have to pass all my classes, and be a RA, and not fuck my residents up too much, and have some semblance of a social life. Possibly. Maybe?
I'm probably writing myself in circles here.
I have done NaNo for six years and this is the first year I've had a week two. Well, its not the fault of the story, more the fault of my professors having huge projects due in classes and tests this week, and being an RA so I have to do things like put up posters and have floor events, plus Harry Potter next week, so its gotten a little crazy writing time wise.
I also might have made a decision that the people at NaNo would call stupid. I changed my entire story.
Okay, so yes, not the best plan when 1667 words a day looks difficult to work in (even for ME, when it takes half an hour to get out 1000 words at most these days), and now I have to play catch up. But, on the plus side, I'm actually liking this story.
We got a pep talk the day after I decided to quit the current story and it said that you shouldn't quit because the writing gets hard or boring, and just plow through. For beginning NaNoers, I agree. Don't quit because it gets hard. Struggling through three hundred words about the sunset or some such is not an excuse to restart your novel. But when you're 13,000 words in, and you have yet to find someone or something that sustains your interest for 1000 words, and every day getting up an writing 2000 words is a drastic struggle and relief, it sucks the fun out of the month.
Yes, writing is not supposed to be about the good days, its about the days when you just don't want to write but do it anyways. I believe this. But there is a difference from slogging through a hard novel that you are still unsure of because it sounds so cliche, with characters that don't interest you incredibly, and writing something that makes you like writing it.
I'm basically trying to justify why I restarted and abandoned Alane and friends. Perhaps that novel is not supposed to be written. Perhaps, Tia and Penny want to be written more. Whatever the reason, I can write 50,000 words easily in a month. Shouldn't I at least enjoy it?
Especially when its a month as busy as this one for me. I'm a senior in college. I have to pass all my classes, and be a RA, and not fuck my residents up too much, and have some semblance of a social life. Possibly. Maybe?
I'm probably writing myself in circles here.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
NaNoWriMo Day 6
Fail.
Just fail.
Now that's out of the way, on with the extravaganza!
I've been reading, I was going to say a lot, but in reality it hasn't been much as I've been super busy. Anyways, what happens around now is the people who don't like NaNo start talking about why NaNo is not a good thing. I was reading an article about how NaNoWriMo just puts more crap out there, and it makes the efforts of "real" writers who do it "right" less significant.
I have things I get upset over. Religion is among them, as is the woman's right to chose, and these statements produce the same sort of rage I get when I read about people saying I'm going to hell for not believing in god, or when someone says that abortion makes angels weep or any of that other type of crap.
True, there are people who write for a living. But does that make them "real" writers? I think not. I consider myself to be a real writer, and I have never published anything. To me being a "real" writer is more about the need to write then about whether you're published or not. There are pleanty of people who are published who I think are utter jackasses who aren't writing good literature (Stephanie Myer I'm looking at you). The fact that you think that these "real" writer's professions are diminished by other people trying it out disgusts me.
Writing is a creative expression, its not like plumping, or engineering, where you could make an applicable comment. No one should EVER say anything about someone else's creative expression without considering the consequences. This does not mean that I think that people aren't bad, I do. But to me, bad is writing about teen vampires who are afraid to change their girlfriend simply for plot -- apparently most teenage girls would disagree with me.
The point is its subjective and telling someone to not write if they want to is stifling them. What harm does it do to you, other then to hurt your own inflated ego as a "real" writer for amateurs to attempt something you do all the time. If your work is really that great, then you don't need to worry about what other people think.
Maybe this is because to me, writing is an expression of myself. I would do it no matter what other people do or say. I don't do it for glamor, or praise. I do it because not doing it physically hurts. My life is enriched my writing. If someone told me to stop I wouldn't. So why would I have the right, or anyone else, to tell anyone else to stop?
Anyways.
Day six and I've finally got around to some blogging. I'm at about 13,000 words, which is lower then I intended to be at. I'm averaging about 2000 words a day, which is fine, but I did intend to write much, much more for this month. Maybe it will shore me up so that when I get a short break -- Thanksgiving is coming up -- and can attempt real 10,000 words days. I did try yesterday with that but was disappointed because I was so tired.
I could consider it today, but I'm too tired really to do anything more then want to sleep.
It would be unfortunate if I got mono, I suppose.
Well, I believe this is the end of my post. I haven't done much blogging about the process, but I wanted some response to the things I have read to be put somewhere.
Just fail.
Now that's out of the way, on with the extravaganza!
I've been reading, I was going to say a lot, but in reality it hasn't been much as I've been super busy. Anyways, what happens around now is the people who don't like NaNo start talking about why NaNo is not a good thing. I was reading an article about how NaNoWriMo just puts more crap out there, and it makes the efforts of "real" writers who do it "right" less significant.
I have things I get upset over. Religion is among them, as is the woman's right to chose, and these statements produce the same sort of rage I get when I read about people saying I'm going to hell for not believing in god, or when someone says that abortion makes angels weep or any of that other type of crap.
True, there are people who write for a living. But does that make them "real" writers? I think not. I consider myself to be a real writer, and I have never published anything. To me being a "real" writer is more about the need to write then about whether you're published or not. There are pleanty of people who are published who I think are utter jackasses who aren't writing good literature (Stephanie Myer I'm looking at you). The fact that you think that these "real" writer's professions are diminished by other people trying it out disgusts me.
Writing is a creative expression, its not like plumping, or engineering, where you could make an applicable comment. No one should EVER say anything about someone else's creative expression without considering the consequences. This does not mean that I think that people aren't bad, I do. But to me, bad is writing about teen vampires who are afraid to change their girlfriend simply for plot -- apparently most teenage girls would disagree with me.
The point is its subjective and telling someone to not write if they want to is stifling them. What harm does it do to you, other then to hurt your own inflated ego as a "real" writer for amateurs to attempt something you do all the time. If your work is really that great, then you don't need to worry about what other people think.
Maybe this is because to me, writing is an expression of myself. I would do it no matter what other people do or say. I don't do it for glamor, or praise. I do it because not doing it physically hurts. My life is enriched my writing. If someone told me to stop I wouldn't. So why would I have the right, or anyone else, to tell anyone else to stop?
Anyways.
Day six and I've finally got around to some blogging. I'm at about 13,000 words, which is lower then I intended to be at. I'm averaging about 2000 words a day, which is fine, but I did intend to write much, much more for this month. Maybe it will shore me up so that when I get a short break -- Thanksgiving is coming up -- and can attempt real 10,000 words days. I did try yesterday with that but was disappointed because I was so tired.
I could consider it today, but I'm too tired really to do anything more then want to sleep.
It would be unfortunate if I got mono, I suppose.
Well, I believe this is the end of my post. I haven't done much blogging about the process, but I wanted some response to the things I have read to be put somewhere.
Sunday, October 31, 2010
NaNoWrIMo
23 minutes until the craziest month of the year begins. November is a fascinating, joy filled time for me because I once again embark on a novel. This year I still don't know what I'm writing and we're now 21 minutes away from the time that you can put the first word on the page that can count.
In general I plan before novel writing. Not a whole lot, just some. I like to create the characters, and delve into the world a little. This is why RPG, while looked down upon by some authors, really helps. You get through the awkward phase where your character is you, reacting and responding to everything, and change it into a separate entity. Its like pregnancy, holding on to this child, and then setting them free to grow and develop more in the novel you write later.
That being said, my favorite character, the one I spent the most time writing while RPing was Adair, who I have not written in something I would like to share with people. Instead she exists, in and out, in other forms.
Still, Ian, Molly and Alice had a good start in RP. Alice especially had an excellent start -- though perhaps this was because I was older, and more mature in my writing. Or so I would like to think.
17 minutes now. I'm kind of pumped. I should be reading about RNA and how it transcribes DNA, but there is a definite excitement in my life, a jump up and down, life is good excitement.
I am contemplating blogging my NaNo. At first this was going to be in a new blog, but this one works just as well. The writing process can be impeded by too much thought, but this is not about trying to make it work for others, but rather for myself.
14 minutes. My phone just went off to inform me of my test tomorrow. I am instead contemplating where to start. My novel this year, I believe, will be the Book of Gates. I have two groups to juggle -- Alane and Mya are the main characters. Mya fascinates me more then Alane does, and in the interest of time and in an effort to just keep writing, I believe I will start with Mya.
I was thinking, reading through some of the Mary-Sue stuff about various characters, that perhaps the whole original idea of the Book of Gates should be scrapped. The most exciting thing about it is Mya and I am heading into 12 novels? Not exciting. We'll see though, because there is a powerful pull from Alane.
9 minutes.
Even if I were to get rid of the entire idea for the entire plot and do something else -- a sequel to A/I/M or the Tower story with Benny and Nat -- I am unsure of where I would start. The other thing I could do would be my literary fiction novel -- Six Impossible Things -- but my creative writing teacher has turned me off to the idea.
I have realized I am going to need a playlist for the month. Perhaps I shall wander off in the last seven minutes to the forums to see suggestions for creating a playlist. Then again, they rarely do what I want -- which is to have songs that make me want to write.
3 minutes.
I had forgotten that the sites gets slower and slower as the first goes by. It is making things more difficult for me. But its fine. We're getting closer and closer. Soon it will be word counts instead of minutes.
I have thought about how I am going to do this. Posts will be short from here until the end of November, but I'm sure you can manage that. I am not expecting much traffic through here. But this is my writing process, how I do things.
No one can tell me what to do. National Novel Writing Month is about to begin.
Hold your breath. We're into the opening stretch.
In general I plan before novel writing. Not a whole lot, just some. I like to create the characters, and delve into the world a little. This is why RPG, while looked down upon by some authors, really helps. You get through the awkward phase where your character is you, reacting and responding to everything, and change it into a separate entity. Its like pregnancy, holding on to this child, and then setting them free to grow and develop more in the novel you write later.
That being said, my favorite character, the one I spent the most time writing while RPing was Adair, who I have not written in something I would like to share with people. Instead she exists, in and out, in other forms.
Still, Ian, Molly and Alice had a good start in RP. Alice especially had an excellent start -- though perhaps this was because I was older, and more mature in my writing. Or so I would like to think.
17 minutes now. I'm kind of pumped. I should be reading about RNA and how it transcribes DNA, but there is a definite excitement in my life, a jump up and down, life is good excitement.
I am contemplating blogging my NaNo. At first this was going to be in a new blog, but this one works just as well. The writing process can be impeded by too much thought, but this is not about trying to make it work for others, but rather for myself.
14 minutes. My phone just went off to inform me of my test tomorrow. I am instead contemplating where to start. My novel this year, I believe, will be the Book of Gates. I have two groups to juggle -- Alane and Mya are the main characters. Mya fascinates me more then Alane does, and in the interest of time and in an effort to just keep writing, I believe I will start with Mya.
I was thinking, reading through some of the Mary-Sue stuff about various characters, that perhaps the whole original idea of the Book of Gates should be scrapped. The most exciting thing about it is Mya and I am heading into 12 novels? Not exciting. We'll see though, because there is a powerful pull from Alane.
9 minutes.
Even if I were to get rid of the entire idea for the entire plot and do something else -- a sequel to A/I/M or the Tower story with Benny and Nat -- I am unsure of where I would start. The other thing I could do would be my literary fiction novel -- Six Impossible Things -- but my creative writing teacher has turned me off to the idea.
I have realized I am going to need a playlist for the month. Perhaps I shall wander off in the last seven minutes to the forums to see suggestions for creating a playlist. Then again, they rarely do what I want -- which is to have songs that make me want to write.
3 minutes.
I had forgotten that the sites gets slower and slower as the first goes by. It is making things more difficult for me. But its fine. We're getting closer and closer. Soon it will be word counts instead of minutes.
I have thought about how I am going to do this. Posts will be short from here until the end of November, but I'm sure you can manage that. I am not expecting much traffic through here. But this is my writing process, how I do things.
No one can tell me what to do. National Novel Writing Month is about to begin.
Hold your breath. We're into the opening stretch.
Monday, October 4, 2010
Two Episodes In
Who was excited by this TV season? Me, that's who. How did the season do as compared to my predictions? Well, some of the shows I haven't gotten around to watching. Anything on Monday at 8 gets cut into by my biochemistry class, so I haven't watched House yet. HIMYM I have watched, because I like doing it with BBT. So lets start with these two.
HIMYM --
This show did well for the first episode. The frame within the frame within the frame was excellent. Robin was still not pleasing as a character, but I have given up on her a little, and am just giggling at the show now. Having given up on standard characterization, the show has fallen prey to the characteristics of sitcom -- over generalization and flanderization. Barney has lost control, Ted is repeatedly placed into positions that make him seem more and more ridiculous. Lily has become shrewish, and Marshall has become more small town, if that is possible. Robin has degenerated into typical femaleness. Still, having these character tropes is not necessarily bad. They can still be funny and lovable, and I'm going to keep watching because... well who is the mother.
I think that they have to reveal who the mother is finally, or its going to stretch the premise to the breaking point. Sure its just the frame, but there is something to be said to remaining true to what you began. I would lose an enormous amount of respect (probably all they have left from me) for the writers if they tried to pull a fast on us again like they did last season with the information about how the mother was in that classroom.
Season six will be interesting to watch and see how they shape things towards that wedding where Ted is the best man. (My prediction is that Barney is getting married. To who? Robin of course. Clearly I am slightly delusional).
Big Bang Theory --
Solid start to the fourth season. Despite the fact that it has been proclaimed that Penny and Sheldon will never be together (and there was something of a jibe about it in the episode), I still think that it could lead somewhere what with that awkward date with Sheldon, his date and Penny. I mean, come on. My fear of the loss of ensembleness that was with this show has been slightly alleviated, though not completely. Howard got face time (hilariously), but Leonard hasn't really had a story in a while, nor has Raj. It continues to be a Sheldon/Penny show. As a character person it bothers me that there isn't a lot of development for the side characters, but for the show it probably works, because most of the humor is found in Sheldon's behavior.
Bones --
Oh Bones! "Gather your squinterns!" Back to the witty banter and Brennan being slightly out there, and just Bonesy goodness. Gotta say the fact that they all got called back for Cam was good, but a little contrived. Still, the first episode was excellent and amusing (though, it annoyed me that the kidnapping case had the father as the bad guy, because I was like "But no! Colby would never do such a thing!" since Dylan Bruno was the actor). The second episode was actually amazing. I dislike Hannah because of the way she speaks, but appreciate that she speaks like she is writing something, which humanizes and characterizes her. But the really amazing part of the second episode was the way that the writers could finally begin to pull on some of the emotional strings they have been playing with for the past five years. Brennan's "I am the only one who is where they expected to be" and her in the bar at the end was heartbreakingly good. Way to have pay off for your hard work Bones. Now, don't blow it, as you are prone to do.
Glee I'm not going to talk about because they upset me by falling back into their usual annoying pattern. 30 Rock was done well, but nothing in particular to talk about with them. I think that's all I've watched. Maybe I'll do an episode recap soon. Maybe not. We'll see. ;)
HIMYM --
This show did well for the first episode. The frame within the frame within the frame was excellent. Robin was still not pleasing as a character, but I have given up on her a little, and am just giggling at the show now. Having given up on standard characterization, the show has fallen prey to the characteristics of sitcom -- over generalization and flanderization. Barney has lost control, Ted is repeatedly placed into positions that make him seem more and more ridiculous. Lily has become shrewish, and Marshall has become more small town, if that is possible. Robin has degenerated into typical femaleness. Still, having these character tropes is not necessarily bad. They can still be funny and lovable, and I'm going to keep watching because... well who is the mother.
I think that they have to reveal who the mother is finally, or its going to stretch the premise to the breaking point. Sure its just the frame, but there is something to be said to remaining true to what you began. I would lose an enormous amount of respect (probably all they have left from me) for the writers if they tried to pull a fast on us again like they did last season with the information about how the mother was in that classroom.
Season six will be interesting to watch and see how they shape things towards that wedding where Ted is the best man. (My prediction is that Barney is getting married. To who? Robin of course. Clearly I am slightly delusional).
Big Bang Theory --
Solid start to the fourth season. Despite the fact that it has been proclaimed that Penny and Sheldon will never be together (and there was something of a jibe about it in the episode), I still think that it could lead somewhere what with that awkward date with Sheldon, his date and Penny. I mean, come on. My fear of the loss of ensembleness that was with this show has been slightly alleviated, though not completely. Howard got face time (hilariously), but Leonard hasn't really had a story in a while, nor has Raj. It continues to be a Sheldon/Penny show. As a character person it bothers me that there isn't a lot of development for the side characters, but for the show it probably works, because most of the humor is found in Sheldon's behavior.
Bones --
Oh Bones! "Gather your squinterns!" Back to the witty banter and Brennan being slightly out there, and just Bonesy goodness. Gotta say the fact that they all got called back for Cam was good, but a little contrived. Still, the first episode was excellent and amusing (though, it annoyed me that the kidnapping case had the father as the bad guy, because I was like "But no! Colby would never do such a thing!" since Dylan Bruno was the actor). The second episode was actually amazing. I dislike Hannah because of the way she speaks, but appreciate that she speaks like she is writing something, which humanizes and characterizes her. But the really amazing part of the second episode was the way that the writers could finally begin to pull on some of the emotional strings they have been playing with for the past five years. Brennan's "I am the only one who is where they expected to be" and her in the bar at the end was heartbreakingly good. Way to have pay off for your hard work Bones. Now, don't blow it, as you are prone to do.
Glee I'm not going to talk about because they upset me by falling back into their usual annoying pattern. 30 Rock was done well, but nothing in particular to talk about with them. I think that's all I've watched. Maybe I'll do an episode recap soon. Maybe not. We'll see. ;)
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Gearing Up
The 2010 - 2011 TV season begins Monday. I believe some shows have started but the majority of the shows I watch are getting their first episode next week. Here's what I'm following and why.
MONDAY:
House, MD --
We left off last season with House and Cuddy making out. WHAT?! Six years and now they start making out? HOW WILL THEY MANAGE SEASON SEVEN? I am curious to see what kind of things they can put House through while still keeping him House. However, I have been scared by How I Met Your Mother's treatment of characters who get together who should be together, so I am unsure if they will manage to pull through this drastic change. Still, it will be exciting and different and could re-energize the show.
How I Met Your Mother --
So, I hated season 5 of this show. Maybe it was the way I watched it, spread out like it is, or possibly its that the writers decided to ruin Robin, who is my favorite female on television, but either way, season 5 was not a good season for me. The last episode was probably the best (because DON IS GONE!) And it was a good place to be leaving off, with change in the air. I think the next season may be able to lift me out of the funk I am in with this show, but we shall see.
Castle --
A third season for Nathan Fillion? SHOCK. But this show has so much excellent, and raw, potential. They had the sense in the finale to have Kate realize she might like Castle enough to give it a go. They are pushing the boundaries they have set up with the week to week stuff and I like it. How far they can go, we will see, but I think that they are clever enough to make it work, and Nathan and Stana are going to make it work with the chemistry enough for me to give up on the writing and still love the show.
TUESDAY:
Glee --
We all know I don't like Glee about 75% of the time. I had my rant before. In my season finale episode wrap up post, which never got published, I mentioned that the finale of Glee was where the writers really got some pay off, and THAT IS HOW PACING IS DONE GUYS. Maybe they will take it from there, but I worry that its a once in a blue moon kind of thing. I have also heard they are cutting down on music and that is not okay with me. But, on the plus side, Kurt is getting a boyfriend and I think this season may have potential, we will have to see.
THURSDAY:
This is the big night.
Bones --
This past season bored me a little, gotta say. It wasn't that it wasn't good, but the little things started to get at me that didn't used to. Like the palm trees that DO NOT EXIST IN WASHINGTON, or the fact that the Washington Metro has a very specific look, and they ignored it, or the fact that that building that was at "American University" could not exist on this campus. But, I like that they have managed to move into a new place with the Bones/Booth relationship. The taking a year break I think is actually an amazing idea. I thought it was well conceived, if not thought out. I will be interested to see where they take it and what's going to happen.
30 Rock --
Oh Tina Fey. I am so hoping that she gets to have a boyfriend this season. I think it would be more fun to see her doing stuff like learning to accommodate someone else into Liz Lemon's life, then her doing the stereotypical ridiculousness they make her do on the show. I will probably be disappointed on this point, but I will continue to watch because its smart and funny.
Big Bang Theory --
Sheldon and a girl. I am a huge Sheldon/Penny shipper, but I think that the relationship that is going to unfold (spoiler) is going to be interesting to behold. I believe that it will, in fact, help my Shenny cause, as it will allow Sheldon to grow and become someone new. Leonard, Raj and Howard must also have face time, but I believe that the real draw of the show now is Sheldon. I worry, however, that BBT will lose its sense of who the show is about like HIMYM did, going from ensemble show to the Barney/Sheldon show. They may not make the same mistakes though, and we can hope that is true.
Grey's Anatomy --
Why? Why, you ask me. Well, Grey's has been a battle for me. I sometimes watch and I sometimes don't, but I believe there could be some interesting stuff coming from this season. It may also be heading towards its conclusion, as Ellen wants to get out of the Grey's business, and I am unsure if Lexie Grey can be the Grey in the title. Its going to be an interesting season, and may result in strangely good episodes.
Private Practice --
See, you should have waited until I said this show to ask me why. Not only is this worse then Grey's, all of the show has turned into a horrible mess of "WHO'RE YOU SLEEPING WITH?". But CHARLOTTE AND COOPER ARE GETTING MARRIED. LOVE.
So that's the new season for me. Maybe a new show will catch my eye. I am debating Nikita, as a new show, but I'm unsure if I'll have time, slash it looks a little trashy. So we'll see. If anyone has suggestions, I'd love to hear them.
MONDAY:
House, MD --
We left off last season with House and Cuddy making out. WHAT?! Six years and now they start making out? HOW WILL THEY MANAGE SEASON SEVEN? I am curious to see what kind of things they can put House through while still keeping him House. However, I have been scared by How I Met Your Mother's treatment of characters who get together who should be together, so I am unsure if they will manage to pull through this drastic change. Still, it will be exciting and different and could re-energize the show.
How I Met Your Mother --
So, I hated season 5 of this show. Maybe it was the way I watched it, spread out like it is, or possibly its that the writers decided to ruin Robin, who is my favorite female on television, but either way, season 5 was not a good season for me. The last episode was probably the best (because DON IS GONE!) And it was a good place to be leaving off, with change in the air. I think the next season may be able to lift me out of the funk I am in with this show, but we shall see.
Castle --
A third season for Nathan Fillion? SHOCK. But this show has so much excellent, and raw, potential. They had the sense in the finale to have Kate realize she might like Castle enough to give it a go. They are pushing the boundaries they have set up with the week to week stuff and I like it. How far they can go, we will see, but I think that they are clever enough to make it work, and Nathan and Stana are going to make it work with the chemistry enough for me to give up on the writing and still love the show.
TUESDAY:
Glee --
We all know I don't like Glee about 75% of the time. I had my rant before. In my season finale episode wrap up post, which never got published, I mentioned that the finale of Glee was where the writers really got some pay off, and THAT IS HOW PACING IS DONE GUYS. Maybe they will take it from there, but I worry that its a once in a blue moon kind of thing. I have also heard they are cutting down on music and that is not okay with me. But, on the plus side, Kurt is getting a boyfriend and I think this season may have potential, we will have to see.
THURSDAY:
This is the big night.
Bones --
This past season bored me a little, gotta say. It wasn't that it wasn't good, but the little things started to get at me that didn't used to. Like the palm trees that DO NOT EXIST IN WASHINGTON, or the fact that the Washington Metro has a very specific look, and they ignored it, or the fact that that building that was at "American University" could not exist on this campus. But, I like that they have managed to move into a new place with the Bones/Booth relationship. The taking a year break I think is actually an amazing idea. I thought it was well conceived, if not thought out. I will be interested to see where they take it and what's going to happen.
30 Rock --
Oh Tina Fey. I am so hoping that she gets to have a boyfriend this season. I think it would be more fun to see her doing stuff like learning to accommodate someone else into Liz Lemon's life, then her doing the stereotypical ridiculousness they make her do on the show. I will probably be disappointed on this point, but I will continue to watch because its smart and funny.
Big Bang Theory --
Sheldon and a girl. I am a huge Sheldon/Penny shipper, but I think that the relationship that is going to unfold (spoiler) is going to be interesting to behold. I believe that it will, in fact, help my Shenny cause, as it will allow Sheldon to grow and become someone new. Leonard, Raj and Howard must also have face time, but I believe that the real draw of the show now is Sheldon. I worry, however, that BBT will lose its sense of who the show is about like HIMYM did, going from ensemble show to the Barney/Sheldon show. They may not make the same mistakes though, and we can hope that is true.
Grey's Anatomy --
Why? Why, you ask me. Well, Grey's has been a battle for me. I sometimes watch and I sometimes don't, but I believe there could be some interesting stuff coming from this season. It may also be heading towards its conclusion, as Ellen wants to get out of the Grey's business, and I am unsure if Lexie Grey can be the Grey in the title. Its going to be an interesting season, and may result in strangely good episodes.
Private Practice --
See, you should have waited until I said this show to ask me why. Not only is this worse then Grey's, all of the show has turned into a horrible mess of "WHO'RE YOU SLEEPING WITH?". But CHARLOTTE AND COOPER ARE GETTING MARRIED. LOVE.
So that's the new season for me. Maybe a new show will catch my eye. I am debating Nikita, as a new show, but I'm unsure if I'll have time, slash it looks a little trashy. So we'll see. If anyone has suggestions, I'd love to hear them.
Friday, May 28, 2010
The Problem With (Glee)
I have a very good friend with whom I share a lot of TV and books and movies who once described watching Torchwood as being like crack: you know its terrible for you, you know its not amazing TV, but you have to keep watching, and when you don't, you go through withdrawal. I thought the part about having to keep watching and withdrawal to be apt (I have not examined Torchwood closely enough to decide whether its really terrible or not, I think its because I'm scared to). But the point is, some shows are like crack, and I think a prime example is Glee.
Glee's pull is the music. A show where people sing? Its like having a musical every episode and that's awesome. I love musical episodes -- they tend to be my favorite episode in a series. I love musicals in general, and so I decided to try Glee.
The major problem with Glee is not the characters (though they could use some work), nor is the plot (hackneyed and cliche in some places), its the pacing. I know I have already discussed pacing -- but that was the good kind of pacing, the kind that draws you in and compels you to keep going. Glee either is attempting this and failing, or the writers have no idea what's going on.
I started Glee after four episodes had aired and felt the compulsion to tear my hair out. They stuff so much plot into those four episodes that it feels like a full half season. Rachel and Finn happen far too quickly, the emotional pull of Emma and Will is too rapid for me to love them. Quinn is pregnant and its really Puck's, but she makes Finn think its his, and Terri is faking a pregnancy. Too much stuff is going on in four episodes for one season, let alone four episodes. The problem continues as the show goes on.
The central plot at the beginning of the series -- that glee club has to succeed in order to continue -- fizzles and dies as the series gets its back nine and so we lose the suspense that could have been built. Terri has an outrageous plan that is so stupid it hurts and degrades Will's character to a chump. Seriously? He wasn't aware that his wife was being really weird about her pregnancy? The plot meanders in and out, and attempts to be interesting, but because it was blown too early, you lose that chance.
The other thing you lose is emotion. I found this particularly jarring in recent episodes when moments that are supposed to be heartwarming just didn't make sense. I am bothered by the Rachel finding her mother storyline. Yeah, it could be interesting eventually to find out about Rachel's mother -- but leave that for another couple of seasons! You have another two already ordered, why bring in something that forces emotionality on the audience when it hasn't been built too? I was confused, sincerely confused, as to why Rachel would want to find her mother. She explained at the beginning that her "two gay dads" had found a surrogate, and yet when the mother thing came up, she suddenly wanted to know why her mother had given her up.
Well, because your mother was a surrogate, and your two gay dads wanted you and had paid money to have you.
The sudden jump to finding her mother happened in two episodes -- and herein lies another problem. This show seems to not understand the concept of time. Terri has been faking her pregnancy since after Quinn got pregnant, and yet Terri had to start padding right away while Quinn still looks like she's not in the slightest pregnant. Additionally, Terri's plan to have Quinn give her the baby during Quinn's spring break seems to be all wrong, as spring break for Jesse already happened and Quinn still doesn't look pregnant. We also spend so much time waiting for sectionals/regionals and get told its coming up so soon, yet because of that we lose the urgency that the writers were looking for.
I suppose the point of this is, Glee is an example of a show that has pacing problems. Its not a good show as a result, and is therefore like crack -- you have to keep watching it because maybe there will be a time when the writers realize what their doing and the show will become good. And in the meantime you get to listen to music. Yes, fast paced is good, but there is something to knowing when too much is happening in a show for its own good.
So take the lesson from Glee. Pacing is important. Work on it, and you might have something that is worth it, instead of just addictive (and will eventually make you lose your teeth).
Glee's pull is the music. A show where people sing? Its like having a musical every episode and that's awesome. I love musical episodes -- they tend to be my favorite episode in a series. I love musicals in general, and so I decided to try Glee.
The major problem with Glee is not the characters (though they could use some work), nor is the plot (hackneyed and cliche in some places), its the pacing. I know I have already discussed pacing -- but that was the good kind of pacing, the kind that draws you in and compels you to keep going. Glee either is attempting this and failing, or the writers have no idea what's going on.
I started Glee after four episodes had aired and felt the compulsion to tear my hair out. They stuff so much plot into those four episodes that it feels like a full half season. Rachel and Finn happen far too quickly, the emotional pull of Emma and Will is too rapid for me to love them. Quinn is pregnant and its really Puck's, but she makes Finn think its his, and Terri is faking a pregnancy. Too much stuff is going on in four episodes for one season, let alone four episodes. The problem continues as the show goes on.
The central plot at the beginning of the series -- that glee club has to succeed in order to continue -- fizzles and dies as the series gets its back nine and so we lose the suspense that could have been built. Terri has an outrageous plan that is so stupid it hurts and degrades Will's character to a chump. Seriously? He wasn't aware that his wife was being really weird about her pregnancy? The plot meanders in and out, and attempts to be interesting, but because it was blown too early, you lose that chance.
The other thing you lose is emotion. I found this particularly jarring in recent episodes when moments that are supposed to be heartwarming just didn't make sense. I am bothered by the Rachel finding her mother storyline. Yeah, it could be interesting eventually to find out about Rachel's mother -- but leave that for another couple of seasons! You have another two already ordered, why bring in something that forces emotionality on the audience when it hasn't been built too? I was confused, sincerely confused, as to why Rachel would want to find her mother. She explained at the beginning that her "two gay dads" had found a surrogate, and yet when the mother thing came up, she suddenly wanted to know why her mother had given her up.
Well, because your mother was a surrogate, and your two gay dads wanted you and had paid money to have you.
The sudden jump to finding her mother happened in two episodes -- and herein lies another problem. This show seems to not understand the concept of time. Terri has been faking her pregnancy since after Quinn got pregnant, and yet Terri had to start padding right away while Quinn still looks like she's not in the slightest pregnant. Additionally, Terri's plan to have Quinn give her the baby during Quinn's spring break seems to be all wrong, as spring break for Jesse already happened and Quinn still doesn't look pregnant. We also spend so much time waiting for sectionals/regionals and get told its coming up so soon, yet because of that we lose the urgency that the writers were looking for.
I suppose the point of this is, Glee is an example of a show that has pacing problems. Its not a good show as a result, and is therefore like crack -- you have to keep watching it because maybe there will be a time when the writers realize what their doing and the show will become good. And in the meantime you get to listen to music. Yes, fast paced is good, but there is something to knowing when too much is happening in a show for its own good.
So take the lesson from Glee. Pacing is important. Work on it, and you might have something that is worth it, instead of just addictive (and will eventually make you lose your teeth).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)