Monday, February 21, 2011

On Following Your Dreams Part II (a work in progress)

Kat and I keep discussing running off to California to write TV. Having a little understanding of how the system works, I am well aware that writing something right away does not happen -- after all think of all the talent out there, and the people you have to fit in with and the endless politics of it all -- but it occurs to me that if I wanted to do it, I am going to need to write some spec scripts. 


Now, being the proponent of practice that I am, I have decided to work with shows that have been off the air for a bit in order to get in my necessary practice. So, looking at my list of shows, I have to remove everything currently running. The list comes out as follows:


Angel
Battlestar Galactica (2004 reimagining)
Boy Meets World
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Caprica
Coupling
Dollhouse
Firefly
Friends
Legend of the Seeker
Pushing Daisies 
Dirty Sexy Money
Scrubs
Sex and the City
Studio Sixty on the Sunset Strip
The West Wing
Ugly Betty
Veronica Mars
Will and Grace
Avatar: The Last Airbender
Black Adder
Sports Night

Now, it has to be a show I know relatively well that has a point where I can imagine a relatively good point for a stand alone episode -- which again narrows down the list. 

Angel
Battlestar Galactica (2004 reimagining)
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Firefly
Friends
Legend of the Seeker
Pushing Daisies 
Scrubs
Sex and the City
Veronica Mars
Will and Grace

Last issue: what kind of writing do I want to do? Comedy has so much to offer in terms of practicing making people laugh, but as a naturally dry person, without an eye for slapstick humor and a preference for nuance in comedy, I suppose the best thing to do would be to focus on the drama/dramady. This makes the list look like so:

Angel
Battlestar Galactica (2004 reimagining)
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Firefly
Legend of the Seeker
Pushing Daisies
Veronica Mars

That's seven shows to write a spec script for. 

Now, I have been writing my own show about my generation (the 20 somethings basically) and our struggles to figure out who we are. Its a half hour comedy and really its only funny to me. But I like it, and I have a lot of ideas for how its going to go and I don't want to get too distracted from it, but I think that in all honesty, writing things for shows that will give me good practice for the kind of things I would be doing anyways, I should probably focus on that. 

Then again, maybe I can do both...

On Creative Processes and People

So I read this blog called Reasoning With Vampires, which basically is this girl reading Twilight and pointing out grammatical errors, and the craziness that occurs in these books. I read it partly because I hate Twlight, and partly because I've never read Twilight and I feel like I am getting the cliff notes with this blog, along with funny commentary (I hate that I have not read Twilight and yet I hate the book so much I can't seem to overcome this. Everything about me finds this to be horribly hypocritical. But every time I attempt to even try to read this book I want to spork my eyes out by about page 20. I can't really tell you why except that the characters are uninteresting, and the world not fascinating enough to captivate me even for that long. Plus, Bella whines a lot about... Something? I think moving to Forks. Thirdly, I have been over informed of the terribleness of this book which colors ever error, every tiny problem, and makes it jump out at me, making it all the harder to even attempt to like it. Why subject myself to that? The point being, I'm totally aware that I am a giant hypocrite, but again -- my blog so I'm going to write whatever I want).

The girl who does it is terribly snarky, and while it somewhat terrifies me that someone could go through my writing like that -- it makes me want to go through and make sure my novels are, at the sentence level, good enough to be read by people. Maybe not millions of people, but enough people that it would matter -- I appreciate the levity and humor that comes from it. Plus, I really hate Twilight and anything ripping it to shreds amuses me.

Anyways, I say all of this, because she recently did a post about Stephanie Meyer talking about Edward leaving Bella in which she called Stephanie a crazy person and got responses to it, and responded to them with this.

Now, me and my friend Bryan have had many discussions that have sounded like the following:

Me: My characters won't let me do that. 
Bryan: But you created them, how do you not control them?
Me: I don't control them. They tell me where the story is going. 
Bryan: But you are God in their world. You get to control them. 
Me: No I don't!

So you may find that my response to Reasoning with Vampires's post to be troubled at best. After all, I love the blog, and find people who yell at her for tearing down Twilight to be annoying and stupid (admittedly, I only read the ones she edits to put up). I am not responding to her post therefore, this is not a "OMG HOW COULD SHE IMPLY THAT I AM INSANE!?" (though it does worry me that I have a similar relationship to my characters that Stephanie does). But it did get me thinking about how there are some authors who think this way -- the characters dictate the story not the author -- and there are some who are not (like Bryan, and the girl who writes Reasoning with Vampires) and apparently, one way, some people just don't understand. 

I suppose it could be the dramatics of it. I find myself often making comments like Stephanie's comments that illicit the post. She spoke about throwing a tantrum because Edward decided to leave, tried offering him other options, and tried everything to get him to not leave. While I don't think I've ever physically expressed having a tantrum over some character's decisions -- that would be crazy -- I would phrase it the way Stephanie did. I have been known to say things like "Me and Molly are in a fight because she is insisting on being more angry with Alice then Ian." Or that a plot line won't work "Because Jon would never do that, and is yelling that its stupid."

When I think about this, it comes from RPing. Me and Dany, the girl I spent the most time writing with, would have conversations that would sometimes turn into real time dialogue, and it translates well into a sensation of being a mouthpiece for the character (instead of the other way around, which is usually the case). So it comes naturally when I talk about writing to say things like "Well, Will said this," as if he had actually said it. Does this mean I actually think he said it? No. Its just the way I say it -- the dramatization of my internal dialogue. 

Internal dialogue, you say, are you sure you're not talking to voices in your head? Okay, so dialogue might imply too many voices in this, but when I say it what I really mean, is the creation of my own stories. I am writing constantly -- whether it be physically on a keyboard, or long hand, or in my head -- I always have something going on in my head, editing and reediting what I will finally commit to paper. Sometimes its stories, sometimes its dialogue, but always its thinking about stories and how they work. 

Anyways, I have finally arrived at my point, if I ever had one, and its this -- the creative process.

I usually start my novels blind -- which is to say I have no idea what's going to happen at the end. This has the interesting effect of making me wandering around in the creative space not sure of where I am going until something happens.

For example, in my NaNo I started with five characters, meandered about with them in space, and let them figure out where they were going. It lead to a wedding, a shot out, the mechanic losing a hand (this I struggled against, but then realized I could use it to my advantage), the decision to bring on new blood, and a rushed stop on a planet that the captain shouldn't have been on. If I had plotted this out, there is no way any of this would have happened. I would have had them struggle about, trying not to be Firefly.

So, this is a good plan, you say. This is the way you write your novels? Well, unfortunately, the problem with not having a plot line to follow is you end up relying on the characters to come to a climax naturally and for the most part, character's don't want to. Have you ever wanted to get involved in a giant fight, or reveal that your society is really overshadowed by an alien influence? The natural tendency is to move away from that, and when I write blind, the story goes places, and you realize things, but the characters do too -- and they want to get the hell away from it.

My most successful novels have been written with an end in mind. Not a clear end I should point out, but rather a conversation, or moment that is clearly a climax, but unconnected to the beginning. I get this idea, this rough plan for what it could be, and then I begin to work backwards, vaguely, from that point plotwise, until I figure out the starting point. Then I write forwards from there, allowing the characters to struggle forward to the ending and denouement.

This vague way of writing, trying not to get too strict on actual conversations and required plot lines allows for the fluidity of the first sort of writing, while also preventing the characters from running amok and avoiding the climax that is preordained. Its a method that I think works well for me, and allows me to create an outline that I can then deviate from by a lot.

In terms of giant, overarching writing, this is my process -- the way I create stories for my characters to inhabit. But characters are the real concern here, as evidenced by my rambling beginning. I talk a lot about how the plot is driven by the characters -- so they are clearly important in some way.

How does character creation go about? What is that process like?

Funny, this whole post was about that, but I still don't know how to answer this question. Character's don't just walk into my head fully formed, but they do come partially formed. The analogy I would use is clay models but with their faces only vague notions of what they should look like, their legs stuck together and arms not fully formed. They come to me unfinished and its my job to find out more about them by writing. The interesting thing is, while writing, they inform me of things. No, not like a crazy person listening to them, but rather via me writing something I didn't realize would come out. Back stories begin to materialize as I move through their worlds.

I have an explanation for this intuition for my character's lives -- practice. Perhaps you have never experienced this, or perhaps you will recognize this feeling -- the brilliant shock of when something that was off hand and unimportant in the first character, suddenly appears in the last chapter as something very important to the plot. You didn't know it was going to be important -- it was put in by accident, or as a character defining moment, or something, but suddenly its important. That feeling is one of the best and for me, tends to happen a lot with characters. Personality ticks that didn't make sense at the beginning, are suddenly defining and important. The intuition that comes from reading a lot (its why everyone says to read as much as possible when you want to write) and writing a lot (which is the other thing) informs your subconscious of what is important and what is not, and will connect things your conscious mind would never have guessed at.

So yes, once again I get to harp on about practice, but it is important, it makes these moments possible, it makes the characters be different from yourself whereas at the beginning they might have been. Practice gives you a lot.

Now, back to the beginning for a moment if I may. My creative process is based on this intuition, and I believe from the quote that was being made fun of, Stephanie's process is similar (wow, some one who I like who hates Twilight made me sympathize with Stephanie? Eesh. Not her best post I guess? Then again, I don't have to agree with her always). It makes us dramatic, and feel like our characters are out of our control. But feeling doesn't imply that they are out of control, just conscious control.

And now on with our regularly scheduled programing (the joke being we don't have any here).

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Fandom

So Kat and I were discussing fandom the other day, and she asked me that if I ever did get around to publishing something how would I feel about people writing fanfiction of my stuff. As someone who really got my legs in fandom, I found the question to be funny. I would be eternally flattered if people wrote fandom about my stuff. But the reason it came up was because she had been reading about authors who don't want fanfiction of their stuff put up on the web.

One of them equated writing fanfiction to her neighbor sleeping with her daughter. It was not a good comparision, but the point was that characters are like children in some ways. I get this, I really do. My characters are, in some ways, like children. You don't want to hear negative things about them, and you don't want them to be ruined, but to be honest, the scariest thing about fandom to me is that there is such bad writing of these characters without thought for how to capture their voices and personalities.

Um, where was I going with this. I got distracted because I started thinking about if there was any ship in my canons that would freak me out (my initial 'that would be weird' was Alice/Molly, but unfortunately, they have a very slashable relationship. I suppose Cassandra and Jon would freak me out because they are siblings, but even that I would just skip over it, rather then freak out about it). OH I REMEMBER.

So, anyways, I was thinking about fandom after that and it mostly came down to pairings. I am a very cannon kind of girl. I always shipped Ron/Hermione, I love Laurie/Amy, George/Alanna made the most sense to me, and Monica/Chandler were my favorite couple for a long time; in general, when a couple are meant to be I ship them. Its only been recently that I've branched out a bit. There are a couple of fandoms where I like character pairings that aren't the official OTP.

Legend of the Seeker for example, was the first show I watched where I was like "I like Cara/Kahlan better together then Richard/Kahlan." I think it was more about the dynamic of their relationship, as Richard and Kahlan are ridiculously cute, but anyways. In Big Bang Theory I kind of have a thing for Sheldon/Penny -- but as Sheldon becomes more and more asexual, there is a certain amount of, "That would be weird".

I was thinking about my propensity towards the cannon couples though today when I was making icons. I recently got distracted by lj icons all over the place and I decided to make some of my own. I was going through Buffy stuff and I realized suddenly that I didn't know who I shipped -- Angel/Buffy or Spike/Buffy. There are certain parts of both relationships that I really enjoy, and I could see Buffy with either of them, but there is something to be said to the fact that at the end of the series she is supposed to be 22. How many people knew who they were supposed to be with forever at that point.

One of the things that keeps occurring to me is the fact that a lot of these characters that you ship, sometimes they aren't forever ships, they are right now ships. You can love them dearly, but relationships do fall apart, and its about the right person (oh dear, I'm talking myself into a corner in regards to Barney/Robin) at the time. I like that it reflects real life. Very few people have epic love stories.

When it comes to my own writing, I do think about ships and what could happen from the characters and their relations to one another. In the novel with Alice, Ian and Molly, there is a huge potential for shipping Ian/Molly (which a little squicks me, but only in their adamance that its just too weird for them). In the end though, I don't even know if the main pairing (Alice/Ian) will end up together because of the issue of -- they are all quite young. People change, and demanding two characters that have diverged remain together is forcing things that shouldn't be forced.

Wow, so that got rambly.

Um. I'll come clean it up later. Or not.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

On Following Your Dreams (a work in progress)

1. 
I was sitting in the car with my brother, father and mother at Thanksgiving. We were driving back from dinner on the Cape and my dad had just said he was tired and would I mind driving. We were looking for an exit and my brother started talking about who amazing his internship was. I kind of wanted to hit him.

2. 
I had a friend in high school who was perfectly nice, if a little needy and clinging. When we graduated she became rather agoraphobic, and didn't go to college as a result. She wrote a piece for a website about something that happened on Bones, and Hart Hanson responded to it. The creator of the show responded to it. I hid her status updates on facebook after that. 

3. 
At Christmas we discovered all of the ornaments had gone missing in my mother's purge of the house. I offered to make some paper cranes, do a little search on google to figure out some paper flowers I could make. I ended up making a kusudama ball -- it involved folding 60 petals and a lot of patience. My brother told me I was doing "craftwork". It wasn't a compliment. 

4. 
I wrote an essay for an application recently that started out like so: "Most people like things that come easily to them – I am not most people." 

5. 
When I told my parents I wanted to be a doctor my mother looked at me and said "Really?" and not in the "Really? You think you can do that?" and not even in the "Really? That's so interesting" way. The kind of "Really?" that means: "Is that really what you ant to do with your life?" The kind of really that speaks to the fact that my mother dropped out of secondary school when she was 16 to go to art school, and now, years later, makes her living from following her art career. The kind of really that means: "I brought you up in privilege so you could find your dreams, and I don't think this is what your dream is."

6. 
Have you ever wanted something so bad it hurt?

7. 
I read this today and there was a longing there -- a scared knowledge that you are not good enough. Its what I feel all the time, the secret behind why I don't tell people about my writing, why I think I won't be able to publish anything ever. I want to live as much as possible, to let go of everything and free fall. I want to go to California and write TV, publish a novel, be someone. But I'm waiting. 


8. 
I'm too scared to jump.

Monday, January 31, 2011

History

Apparently I've given up on numbering these. Huh. Well. Josh wrote an entry about ideas and getting things going and privacy and it got me thinking about my own writing. I'm not going to post anything here -- you know first rights get messy when you post on websites, and I want to keep my options open right now, especially since, ew editing -- but it occurs to me that I talk and talk about writing, but my own history remains clouded.

You might not be interested, but this is my blog and you don't have to read my entries, so I'm going to do it anyways.

I don't remember when I started writing specifically. There is an old book I made when I was 6 about someone who lost a tooth, and old diaries in which I wrote things about fairy stories I wanted to write to evidence that its been a while. I can't remember not writing. I do remember the first time I started a novel. It was, in some ways amusingly, fanfiction for Julie of the Wolves. It was awful, and involved a ten year old kayaking down the east coast as part of a race. I did get about 60 illustrated pages in before I stopped, worried that it was too similar to Julie of the Wolves.

My next attempt was with Josh and Jasper. Jasper had gotten really into Warcraft 3000, and was telling us about the story and we got into a discussion on how to make a story that would work. This is the first and only time me and my brother have collaborated on anything creative together. Usually Jasper pisses me off too much for us to have conversations, so it seems like we're unlikely to start that again.

Sometime later I had a tutor who wrote a 14000 word story with me, which I illustrated and for the most part I plotted. I still have it somewhere, and its amusing to read. I sent it to a magazine once, but they said it was too long (what a surprise).

Serious fantasy came next because I started reading Tamora Pierce. There was the Five Worlds series which has since been lost, Rise of the Phoenix, which actually wasn't a terrible idea and when I put it up on the original fiction part of fanfiction.net got reviews that shaped my future writing career. I had a problem with pacing in seventh grade, and this person wrote an extensive review of how I should read more and needed to pace things better. I got mad at yelled at them later, but I wish I knew who it was now, because -- well everything changed after that.

There was Apinda, a novel I wrote with Felix and Rory's help the summer before ninth grade. It was basically an idea similar to The Old Kingdom but there were some clever bits in there about races and a world banded in seasons. Unfortunately I'm a bit too science-y to be willing to write it now, plus I would need to reestablish a connection to the characters, but it was an idea at the time. Apinda was the first novel I ever finished -- hand written in a notebook I have since lost. I loved that I finished it.

I was about to say I didn't know what I did between ninth and eleventh grade, but it occurs to me that it was the RP phase of my life where I wrote consistently for days and days and days with two people (for the most part). Cat, who helped shape Adair and Will, and Dany who helped create Jacob and Cnyderia. This was probably the most industrious part of my life, the time when I got the most practice and worked out my pacing issues. This was the part of my life where everything was about getting to write that post, to get things out. I often say that RPing is a great way to become a better writer (maybe not here) and it is because this was the point where characters became different from me, the point when I found my feet as a writer. RPing may have screwed me up socially (okay, it did. My second boyfriend came around during this time and I dumped him because he was cutting into my RP time... how screwed up is that? Also, I stopped being friends with certain people during this time, and in the end, the person I was closest with during RP vanished abruptly and without warning, leaving me with a host of issues that probably precipitated the break with my current (at the time) best friend... I have suffered for my art... or am just a screwy person, your choice) but it gave me a huge amount of practice (there was so much writing all the time) and cemented my love of writing.

After that novels started coming out every year. I started NaNo and wrote -- a lot. Since then I have written 6 novels in their entirety and have countless other projects which are all at least 10,000 words in (mostly because these days 1 chapter is 10,000 words x.x). There are two novels which I have begun the clean up of, three which are never going to see the light of day (partly because half of them got lost when my hard drive died, and partly because THEY ARE SO BAD), one which is actually all right, but is the first book in a series that I don't know where it is going and one which has been turned into a web graphic (a graphic novel on the web if I ever get around to putting it up).

Um... I don't know why I wrote this. I REALLY don't know why you read this if you got to the end. It was a bunch of rambling because I was reading Josh's post (have I mentioned Josh is my cousin? I don't know if I have, but he is, and probably the person out there who I have shared most of my creative endevers)  and he has this one project which he has been working on for years, and I was like "What have I got to show for a lifetime of writing?" (lifetime = 22 years thus far). This is what I've got to show. Seven novels, two that I would be willing to show to anyone. Well, show might be a little bit of a stretch.

After the RP phase, I stopped showing people my writing, or talking about the fact that I did write. People who knew me from before knew I loved to write, but people after often get surprised when I say I write, and their surprise surprises me. I could probably read something in to that, couldn't I?

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

On Comedy

There is something to be said about talent in the field of comedy, a personality that goes well with being funny. From the reading/watching documentaries about my favorite comedians (Eddie Izzard, Jon Stewart, Margaret Cho) the personality type that brings out stand up comedians is perseverance. It is not, in the end about being really funny (though I'm sure it helps). The ability to talk into the silence is what makes a good stand up comedian, and as I am currently writing a blog about writing and don't even have the guts to share my writing with my best friend, stand up is probably out for me. Not that I really wanted to do it.

The other kind of comedy you get is from writing. There are mediums to writing comedy and shows that come to mind almost at once for me: the straight up sitcom (Friends, How I Met Your Mother), the dramady (Castle, Psych), shows that are serious drama but have humorous moments and sarcastic comments (Sherlock, Doctor Who), novels that are humorous (The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, David Sedaris pieces) and so many other forms that listing them would waste your time. So the question becomes, how in these contexts, do you create comedy. And do you want to include it (the answer is yes, always yes).

Comedy looks easy and is hard while drama looks hard and is easy. You can kill someone off in a dramatic, horrible fashion easily, but you can't just have someone walk into a room, slip on a banana peel and have people laugh. So the first thing I think about when attempting to write humorously is practice.

I am a big proponent of practice. Malcolm Gladwell, in his book Outliers, brings up the point that most people who are considered to be geniuses in their fields are in fact, simply well practiced -- a lot practiced in fact. He goes into a magical number, and while its interesting, its not the major point, you can read the book if you want to know more. The point is that practice is very important. I don't think I had really grasped this until I took a class in logic and discovered that the only way to learn logic was to do logic problems, over and over again until something clicked. But then it started bleeding into other parts of my life. I realized that chemistry made more sense because I had practiced problems in it to the point where it was intuition that brought about the answer, I found that when I was saying my characters were "telling me" how the story went, it was because I have read and written for a long time, and my mind was following the path that stories go in, piecing back extraneous information from the first chapter to make it very important without me even realizing it.

Practice allows you to write without thinking about it, which in turn, allows you to write effortlessly, discovering the story as it comes out of you, and seems natural instead of forced. So, shouldn't practice help you fumble for the joke, the moment that will be the most funny? I don't see why not. Most people say when you start attempting humor, you should write in the voice of someone you admire who is funny. When you do this, you are starting to ingrain the flow of your humor, you are practicing being funny the way you want to be.

So practice, its important, but there are other factors involved, of course. These factors do depend more on genre then on anything else -- after all the joke in a sitcom is not the same as the joke in a dramady, and the joke written for TV can fall flat on the page without an actor to prop it up.

I suppose though that there is a common theme to comedy and that is taking something and expressing it in a new and unexpected way -- juxtaposing situations, or physical gags -- but always leading to some greater truth. Comedy gets to express truth through making you laugh, and I think in some ways, it makes the lesson stick better that way.

Now, if only I could write it. I'm just going to attempt witty at the moment. ;)

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

A Thought

Kat wrote an EPIC fanfiction piece for Yuletide (now moved elsewhere, but this will give you an idea of what it is) which has somehow wormed its way into my brian (impulse was to say soul) and we are currently in the early stages of writing a TV series based on it. Its fun and stimulating, and its helping me (and Kat too) work on our humor writing (impulse was to say circuits. The RoseyBot 2010 has defective humor circuits, hopefully in the RoseyBot 2011 will have had some practice by the end of the year and a re-released model will be better equipped to provide you amusement), and work on being NOT SUPER DRAMATIC ALL THE TIME (evidenced by my use of caps).

Anyways, the point is not about the TV show or the fic, or humor writing -- though there may be a post on that in the future -- but rather it is about characters.

Shockingly, I like characters. I think people know this by now, but if not, I like characters. Why does this matter?

Well Kat made a comment about how one of her characters, a jock who was woken up at an odd hour, thought about going for a run. The comment goes something like this "I would never think to go for a run. [He] really has a mind of his own."

I hadn't thought about it much until now, but my response was "Of course he has a mind of his own, he's not you." Funnily enough though, once I did begin to think about it, the thought occurred to me that I remember the first time I thought something similar.

I must have been a freshman in college, and a character of mine, who is all about action, and not sitting still, and chasing after bad guys, was told she was going to have to read, and she threw a minor hissy fit over it. Reading, Sam stated (as her name was Sam), Is for boring people. I don't read.


I have never written a main character (being one of the POV characters) who doesn't read. Some of them are avid readers, others are not, but all of them were well read, and had a certain grasp on why literature was important. Sam was completely different. She wanted nothing to do with books because they bored her.

In other words, she had a mind of her own.

It was invigorating, exciting, and it gave me a whole different set of ideas about characters I already had in the world, and how I was just viewing a tiny facet of all of them. Sam was different and it was a minor miracle to me.

I think its good to get into the minds of other people -- after all it does take all kinds to make the world -- but I find it fascinating how there is a line at which you stand when you're a writer, the line between yourself and your characters, and with each successive character, with more practice, the line begins to sharpen rather then blur.

Has anyone else experienced the first moment when they truly felt separate from their characters? Was it great, or did you feel it was bittersweet?

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

A Moment

(Warning: mild Alias spoilers for season 1)

You know how you know you watch too much TV?

Kat and I had just finished Psych and were attempting to figure out our new show to watch. We were going to do Sports Night but finally settled on Alias as usually we watch shows I have watched, but Alias  is one that Kat has seen and I have not.

We got to the episode where Sydney decides to turn her father in and as soon as he walks into the meeting and says something about how Sydney can now learn the truth I go "Oh, it was the mother who was the spy."

Kat informs me that most people would not jump to that conclusion at once, but it makes good, economical sense to have the mother be the spy, and have Vaughn's dad be killed by this unknown agent who could be Sydney's dad -- too many characters can drag a show down.

So yes. I watch too much television because I knew without any real foreshadowing about this secret on Alias. I am a giant dork.

A Second List of Possibilities

Shows that have been added to my repertoire:

36. Psych
37. Alias
38. Futurama
39. Avatar: The Last Airbender
40. The IT Crowd 
41. Sherlock 
42. Black Adder
43. Sports Night
44. Episodes
45. Mr. Sunshine 
46. Dead Like Me
47. Fullmetal Alchemist

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Influences

For a blog about analyzing writing, lately, its become slightly personal. I don't know where the last entry came from, except I didn't have anywhere else to put it. I need to update this more -- figure out where its actually going and coming from. But anyways, I'll do that later.

There was a facebook meme going around where you put down 15 authors who have influenced you. I think it was more about thoughts and ideas then about writing, but I think its applicable. I didn't post it on facebook, but I'll post it here along with commentary. They are listed in no particular order, just who I thought of first.

1. Douglas Adams 

Comedy has never been a strong suit of mine. If I do anything comedic, it is always sarcastic and dry; very British as my friends would say, though to be honest, I don't know if its true that British humor is so clear cut. I will, however, admit to the fact that Douglas Adams always makes me want to write comedic stuff. I once attempted it by emulating his voice -- putting the preposterous into a statement that appears to make sense -- and it was awful, just awful.

That being said, Douglas has influenced the way I view writing about space. My NaNo, which changed dramatically this year, was in space, and I often found myself borrowing from some of the more ridiculous things that Douglas does -- the names, and on occasion, the creatures. There was a lot of creative energy, imagination and plan interest in all of Douglas's work, and that is something I aspire to.

2. Neil Gaiman

Its funny, I was reading The Sandman at the desk the other day and someone asked me what else Neil had written that I had read. I got kind of stuck because despite the fact that I feel like there is a lot of Neil Gaiman out there, I haven't read all of it. I've done Stardust and American Gods. I've read The Graveyard Book and some of his short stories, but when it comes down to it, I am always at a loss as to what to say when someone asks that question.

Neil's influence on me has not been writing style -- I will admit I found some of American Gods hard to read because of the writing style -- but rather on ideas. In Stardust, Fairy is constantly changing, growing as people dream it, and it came from seeing a wall while driving. In American Gods, a war is coming, but it is between the old gods, and technology itself, a fascinating mixing of layers and intrigues.

I don't want to write like Neil, I want to think like Neil -- finding a story where ever you look.

3. Clive Barker

Abarat is the only book I have read by Clive (plus its sequel) and if you've never read it, I hope you do. When you do, I suggest you get the color version with his artwork. Its beautiful.

That being said, Clive has actually influenced me in other ways then me thinking about writing a story with images (though after reading Abarat I thought about trying it. Its an in progress project that will take forever to finish because its all on my mother's computer and I would need a wacom tablet to really do it). Similar to Neil, Clive has amazing ideas. The idea of twenty four islands that exist as times of day is interesting and provides a fantastical and fantastic backdrop for the story, which is surprising and rich.

Abarat was the most original story I had read at the time and when I was done I sat still, wondering how I would ever write something so different from what you expect.

4. Diane Duane

Young Wizards and the world that it inhabits is probably my favorite series apart from Harry Potter. In some ways, Diane's world outclasses J. K.'s, but really I would like to keep them as separate as possible, despite them both being about wizards working behind the scenes of our own world. Now that's out of the way...

I don't remember reading the first book in this series clearly. So You Want to be a Wizard was good, but a little distant to me at the time, but the idea of magic being controlled by words -- the Speech -- a basic language for the universe was so interesting to me. Young Wizards remains completely technologically based with the Speech being a programming language. The concept of the world as such is extremely pleasing to my world view -- everything based on logic in terms of magic, making the twists that the characters manage to pull out all the better because you don't see it coming but it makes so much sense.

But its not just the internal rules making so much sense (despite the shifting time period, though I appreciate that as who would want to read a book that was still in the eighties when there are so many opportunities in modern life to play with for Diane), its also about the character's themselves. Nita especially.

I am so glad I read these books as a teenager (and again as a young adult, they are still coming out). There is something so relatable about the characters and you love them and sometimes you hate them, but you always understand where they are coming from. Wizard's Dilemma never fails to make me cry -- hard and most of the way through the book -- Wizards at War never fails to make my heart skip a beat in the middle, and at the end my heart breaks over and over again. A Wizard of Mars had me cheering at the end, despite my disinclination towards Nita and Kit being together. These are characters that I love and I want to keep reading about them. And that is the main influence I have gotten from Diane.

The last thing I got from her is the fact that you can have serial novels -- there is no limit to the number of Young Wizard novels she can write because the premise is solid. Saving the world is Nita and Kit's job -- but its also Dairine's and Carmela's -- and all the characters you never get to meet. They aren't the only ones saving the world, we just get to watch their part, and that is really interesting to me.

5. William Styron

Whenever I get asked what my favorite book is, I feel an onrush of panic. What to say? I love Harry Potter a lot, but what about Young Wizards? And what if its just one book that I have to decide on -- my favorite book from a series? I don't generally, read books that are stand alone making it difficult to decide. So I say "What? That's like Sophie's Choice! Deciding on ONE book as my favorite? Luckily, I really like Sophie's Choice so let's say that."

Of all the authors I have read, William Styron (who I can't call by his first name), has influenced my writing style. I read Sophie's Choice in high school in the best English class I've ever been in (AP English with DePeter) and we looked at the language carefully and it was then that I decided -- I want to write like this.

Styron introduced me to the dash, to beautiful language, to self referential writing, to discussion of mental illness without really talking about it. There is so much about this book that I want to emulate. If I were to ever write a novel that wasn't fantasy/sci fi, I would want to write a novel like Sophie's Choice.

6. Louisa May Alcott

There's a FRIENDS episode where Rachel says she has re-read Little Women a lot, a classic, and I know exactly what she means. I have re-read Little Women so many times since I first opened it in third grade. Each time I come away with something new -- a different association, and point of interest. Little Women still makes me cry when Beth dies, still makes me incredibly happy when Laurie comes for Amy in Vevey, and remains one of my favorite books of all time.

Sometimes I think about how the book is set up -- a group of stories about a family that loves one another. There is a moral -- all books at that time had to have one -- but if you ignore the moral, then you get a lovely portrait of people -- and that is the important message about writing. Character's always drive my interest in reading, and in writing.

7. L. M. Montgomery

Similar to Ms. Alcott, Mrs. Montgomery has a childhood appeal to her. I read Anne of Green Gables, Anne of Avonlea, and Anne of the Island before stopping. I like thinking of these three books as a trio and ignoring the rest because I never got into the rest. However the appeal is partly Anne -- again a character based story surprisingly -- but also the kind of childhood scrapes people get into, the childlike delight Anne takes in everything which allows a nostalgic feeling and that is something I enjoy and use today in my own writing.

8. J. K. Rowling

While I don't remember reading So You Want to be a Wizard for the first time, I remember Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone clearly. I was in England in fifth grade for a month, and I was in my aunt's house, which was a converted barn at the time. My cousin Josh gave me the book, and said he liked it, and I had already received Chamber of Secrets from my grandmother for Christmas, so I thought Why not?


I didn't stop reading until I got to the end. This is the first book I read cover to cover. And I still remember how freaked out I was by the end, how I kept making funny noises and shaking with how awesome this book was/is.

There is no way that J. K. couldn't have influenced me. The subtle influence, of word choice and character creation is something that comes from other places, but for me the reason J. K. continues to be a major influence in my writing is the world building she did.

9. C. S. Lewis

After the last post you might be confused as to why I would put down a clearly Christian writer, but L. M. Montgomery and Louisa May Alcott were more preachy about religion then these books in my opinion. Well except The Magician's Nephew, but lets move on.

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe was certainly among the first books that I remember reading. I re-read them every now and then (and with the new movie, which I still have not seen, so no spoilers please) I probably will read them again. There is something incredibly nostalgic and endearing about them that I love. This from a series that was published around the time of Lord of the Rings and with just as rich a background story, but with language that was easy to understand, and a story that takes a lot of the ancient and makes it modern.

10. Phillip Pullman

As soon as I put down C. S. Lewis, I knew I had to put down Phillip. I ran through The Golden Compass, was obsessed with The Subtle Knife and got The Amber Spyglass the day it came out (I was sick, but my dad picked it up for me... also was in sixth grade so I wasn't able to go at midnight to wait for it). Again, as with J. K. I was subtly influenced by Phillip. His writing is interesting and nuanced. It laces science with religion and creates a world that is almost, but not quite, like our own in such a way that you believe it -- deeply and seriously.

I read other things by Phillip -- though I can't remember them clearly as Sally Darling did not stay in my head the way Lyra did -- but what I do remember is the complexity of character, the way it was definitely the characters that drew me in. And, would you look at that, I love characters.

11. Tamora Pierce

Without a doubt Tamora Pierce has influenced the way I write the most seriously. My first attempt at a chaptered work was a cheap Tammy knock off. There is a lot to be said about what Tammy did for my sense of fantasy writing. Large scale battles, and women with swords and magical fire that burst from their fingertips had never occurred to me until I read her work.

Tammy's worlds are typically fantastical, but they are rooted in reality. There are gods and goddesses that regularly visit and talk with characters. Magic is common, and possessed by those born to it. The thing about Tammy's work is not that she breaks boundaries in her worlds, but in that she empowers her female characters while maintaining their femininity. They are people and it wasn't until I got into broader fantasy that I realized this was not common.

12. Garth Nix

If you have never read Sabriel I suggest you do. The world Garth created in this work is endlessly fascinating with a deep and rich background history. And he does it over and over again. I have only read the Old Kingdom series and The Keys to the Kingdom, but both of them have wonderful worlds and a definite sense of time and space.

The attention to real detail is something that I have picked up from Garth. He is specific in many of his descriptions, lending them the aspects of the objects or things in question. Scenes are better done when there is an exact quality to the descriptions, ideas of time and space and clearer when you are given measurements (though not too many). I have never read anything else quite like it, but I find the level of detail in Garth's work something to live up to.

13. David Sedaris

Moving out of my childhood books, we get to David. Ah David, you funny, funny man. I have already said that humor has never been my strong suit, but I do find that reading and listening to it to be the best way to learn how it is done. Whether it is through the comedy of performance (which David does) or the way he states things with clarity, he is able to provoke a laugh.

Sometimes a turn of phrase, or a way of saying something that is so thoroughly different and bizarre, but perfectly right, will come out of me and I know it has come from reading him.

14. Malcolm Gladwell

Moving out of fiction all together we get to Malcolm and Mary. Malcolm Gladwell has influenced the way I think in many respects, not because I agree with him all the time, but because every time he says something I think about whether or not I do agree with him based on his arguments.

Writing fiction might not be trying to make you agree that communication is the best, but it certainly is about trying to get people to believe in what you are writing. Malcolm has shown some obvious flaws in logic in some of his writing, but the interesting thing is not that he does so, but that it can show you flaws in your own logic. There have been times when I have found myself backpedalling, attempting to find the edge of my "argument" because I can sense such a hole appearing. I'd like to give some of that credit to Malcolm.

15. Mary Roach


Dealing with horrible situations with dry witticisms, Mary Roach has convinced me that it is always important to have a sense of humor. Death seems to attract Mary a little, but I don't mind, it does me too -- and for Mary its always a little different. However, the tendency, that I believe is mostly human, to add humor to situations that are grime is very telling.

All death, mayhem and horror is not something you read. Gallows humor on the other hand -- you can read and laugh.



So there it is. My 15 influences. Who's influenced you, people who are starting to comment on here to my shock. :)